![]() Schmidlin PR, Stawarczyk B, Wieland M, Attin T, Hämmerle CH, Fischer J (2010) Effect of different surface pre-treatments and luting materials on shear bond strength to PEEK. Kern M, Lehmann F (2012) Influence of surface conditioning on bonding to polyetheretherketon (PEEK). Stawarczyk B, Bähr N, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Eichberger M, Gernet W, Jahn D, Schmidlin PR (2014) Influence of plasma pretreatment on shear bond strength of self-adhesive resin cements to polyetheretherketone. Williams DF, McNamara A (1987) Potential of polyetherketone (PEEK) and carbon-fibre-reinfroced PEEK in medical applications. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 100:1044–1052 Lee WT, Koak JY, Lim YJ, Kim SK, Kwon HB, Kim MJ (2012) Stress shielding and fatigue limits of poly-ether-ether-ketone dental implants. Wu X, Liu X, Wei J, Ma J, Deng F, Wei S (2012) Nano-TiO2/PEEK bioactive composite as a bone substitute material: in vitro and in vivo studies. Santing HJ, Meijer HJ, Raghoebar GM, Özcan M (2012) Fracture strength and failure mode of maxillary implant-supported provisional single crowns: a comparison of composite resin crowns fabricated directly over PEEK abutments and solid titanium abutments. Stawarczyk B, Beuer F, Wimmer T, Jahn D, Sener B, Roos M, Schmidlin PR (2013) Polyetheretherketone-a suitable material for fixed dental prostheses? J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 101:1209–1216 Meningaud JP, Spahn F, Donsimoni JM (2012) After titanium, PEEK? Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac 113:407–410 Tannous F, Steiner M, Shahin R, Kern M (2012) Retentive forces and fatigue resistance of thermoplastic resin clasps. Schwitalla A, Müller WD (2013) PEEK dental implants: a review of the literature. Successful bonding on PEEK surfaces can be achieved by surface roughening and subsequent surface activation with acetone- or phosphate-based methacrylate primers or tribochemical treatment. Combination with opaque revealed an increase in SBS. Surface conditioning prior to bonding seems essential. Conclusionsįor good bonding between PEEK and composite, cleaning and roughening is recommended. Significant ( p < 0.001) differences were found between the individual systems after 24 h, TC and after 90 days storage. After water storage, nine systems provided SBS higher than 5 MPa, seven even values higher than 10 MPa. After thermal cycling (TC), nine of the investigated systems showed SBS higher than 5 MPa, varying from 8.8 ± 2.7 MPa (#7) to 19.4 ± 2.5 MPa (#4). Only etching caused a significant ( p < 0.001) increase. ![]() ![]() Means and standard deviations were calculated (statistics: one-way ANOVA/Bonferroni (α = 0.05)). For investigating the influence of storage and aging, the specimens were either stored in distilled water (37 ☌, 90 days) or thermally cycled (12,000 cycles 5 ☌/55 ☌, distilled water). Baseline tests were performed 24 h after composite polymerization. Shear bond strength (SBS) was determined following ISO TR 11405. Eighteen different pre-treatment combinations were applied, partly combined with opaque application. ![]() Cylinders of composite were polymerized onto the surfaces. Surface roughness was determined after different treatments. Surfaces (570 plates) were used untreated, etched, air-particle abraded or activated with silica-modified alumina oxide. This study aims to test the influence of different surface treatments and conditioning on the shear bond strength between polyetherketone (PEEK) and composite. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |